I supported it, but do not now.
At the time, I thought that taking out Saddam was a good idea. Killing/capturing Saddam and making Iraq a generally better place was and is a good thing.
However, what changed is my knowledge of history, and becoming a Libertarian starting in 2008-2009 through a lot of research. I began to understand a few things concerning how such intervention is a crap shoot in terms of results, becoming unbiased on our debt and military spending, and trying to ensure my beliefs are in-line with the rest. Furthermore, I saw the precedent of what our attacks did, which was strengthen the resolve of nations employing similar actions like Russia did in South Ossetia against the Georgians.
Because of this, I believe its better for America to stay out of wars that are not directed against allies which we have a responsibility to render mutual aid to. Unless someone is attacking a NATO ally or Asian friend, we really shouldn't be messing in wars. It'd do wonders for our debt, too.
Oh, and in regards to WMDs. We actually found quite a bit that Saddam did not destroy. There was a smoking gun moment that we did find them, despite the fact that no one really talks about or cares about it. Even if there was such a moment, I still wouldn't support the war because there are a lot of countries needing regime changes that have WMDs like North Korea. We can't pick and choose who we beat up, because it shows we're hypocritical.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
