damefan said:
Its not that much more powerful if any. The online is free but its not as good, hence why its free. If you are a solo gamer then the PSN is fine. If you play with friends then LIVE is better. 360s has built in N wifi. 360 upscales DVDs to HD. Its a matter of preference. You seem to think that its a fact the PS3 is a better product. I prefer my 360. I use my PS3 for exclusives but PSN is terrible compared to LIVE, updates take forever and there is a new one every week. 360 controller is much better IMO. |
DF and LOT both said/showed that the ps3 has some advantages, while the xbox one has advantages. they have their different cons to, but like i said based off their analyse, they are the same, and if you say other wise your really pulling straws.
ps3 also upscales DVD's so whats your point. and has had built in wifi since launch
so how is psn terrible, i bet you cant give a ligitimate reason why live is better.
i post, what i said in the MOst overrated thread:
people pay $60 for what? hardly any dedicated server games (playstation has wa more) small multiplayer counts, i think the most so far is 24. (psn has 30, 32, 60, and i believe 256) no internet browser. very closed network (cant get games with features like LBP and Portal) it started the paid DLC psn has netflix, vudoo, mlb.tv, nhl network, hulu, and even espn3 through the browser (all of these at no extra charge) the only thing it has the psn doesnt (though the free steam does) is cross game chat. so they are paying $60 to use their own internet connection and are happy about it. theres a reason paid for window live failed. people new that werent paying for anything, they were getting scammed