dib8rman said:
Don't give me that crap, the rules of the conqueror may be old but they aren't forgotten, it's the conquered’s duty to remain subjugated or remove their conqueror. The international community has laws set in place to recognize this one fact, when Madison said the cost of freedom is war he didn't mean American blood had to be spent for the world to have it's freedom. |
Right, and we've been fine having a hands-off approach to various revolutions, but in this case the revolutionaries needed assistance of a limited nature (namely, destruction of the regimes air defenses)
We're not talking about doing it for them, they had the will and the initiative (at least for a time), but were hedged in by their superior-equipped foes.
It's all about knowing *when* to intervene, and i would guess on this point that this disagreement will not be resolved on our end, but i maintain that this was an ideal situation to intervene in, and a situation that the USA had to intervene in due to compelling public relations interests

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







