I want to also add this to the discussion:
I would argue that a definition of "harming others" is to cause them loss. In this case, people who have established relationships with one another, is often based on the exchange that happens from the relating between them. The individuals get positive from being in the relationship with someone. If that relationship were to end, due to one person passing on, they harm the other person. So, in light of this, would need to ask here: What kind of state is a person in, if their passing on doesn't harm anyone else? Would not such a state be an indictment on society and its values and a failure to provide means enabling someone to establish meaningful relationships with others? Or, if a society drove someone to an extent the cut off all contact with humanity, wouldn't that also be a sign things went somewhere wrong?
