CGI-Quality said:
Hyruken said:
Well having now played all three of the games (Crysis 2, KZ3 and UC2) i think Crysis 2 on 360 is "almost" on par with KZ3.
KZ3 is the better looking game in my view because overall it is far more consistent.
Crysis 2 is a really good game and the graphics are amazing. The bit where you have to create a diversion and bomb the two churches, if you just stop a bit and look around at the sky line and all the little details it really is jaw dropping. Those bits are on par with what Killzone 3 has. The best bits of Crysys 2 look as good as the best bits in Killzone 3 imo.
But there are some parts of Crysis 2 where it is nowhere near the standard of those good ones. There are some parts where it just seems that it was not given the same love as other places. While these places still look ok they are a drop in the overall presentation.
So i think overall KZ3 looks better just because it is more consistent, it looks the same pretty much from start to finish.
But Crysis 2 is by far the better game in terms of gameplay in my view.
|
I'd say it's arguable who's gameplay is better between KZ3 & Crysis 2. They play different, so that comes down to preference, but both do a good job of accomplishing what they set out to accomplish.
Everything else is we agree 100% (which is a rarity). 
|
I agree too but I liked the Killzone 3's multoplayer gameplay more... no I loved it... in Crysis 2 I was liking more the SP than MP (but I played so little both because I don't have the game yet... played together friends).
