mantlepiecek said:
Killiana1a said:
mantlepiecek said:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-crysis2-face-off
The PS3 version maintains its frame rate throughout the whole game perfectly even though its lower than the 360 version. The 360 version however has frame-rate going below 20 fps in some scenes. What this means is that the PS3 version operates more consistently then the 360 version, but the 360 version seems to hit 30 fps a lot more.
There is no screen tearing visible on either consoles.
Which is why he seemed to think that either versions are equally good.
|
Did we read the same article? Do I see objects that you are pulling out of the air?
Let me quote from the article for you,
There's little doubt that the Xbox 360 is the cleaner, crisper experience and for the most part it commands a small but significant frame-rate advantage and fewer little glitches; especially outside of combat scenarios, the game just seems to run that much more smoothly. However, there are parts of the game that seem to be brutally unoptimised, bringing the performance level crashing down to the point where the afflicted sections become almost unplayable - a variable 15-20FPS update in an intense fire-fight is hugely disorientating, and this makes Crysis 2 one of the most inconsistent performers released in recent times.
In these situations, it seems that it is the Xbox 360 version that has the most difficulties, though there's no mistaking that both platforms seem to lag badly in much the same areas....
On balance, 360 has the edge in terms of visuals and general performance, but PS3 more than holds its own, bettering the Microsoft platform in some areas.
I did not read "equally good" between both versions in the ARTICLE! You should definitely re-read because something is clouding your point of view and I can smell that shit a mile off. It don't smell good.
|
I think something is clouding your eyes because when I read the whole article nothing suggested that the 360 version was better. It has the edge in terms of graphics and general performance, so it isn't completely in favour of the 360. "The PS3 more then holds its own" is supposed to be read.
Also did you read this:
"It's difficult to give any really strong recommendation about which version of Crysis 2 to buy if you're in the enviable position of being able to choose between both HD console platforms. The good news is that taken as a whole, they are both really impressive games, for the most part."
Its obvious people are nitpicking my post now, really, that is quite sad of you because I wasn't quoting, I was giving a brief summary.
It doesn't matter if the PS3 wins or loses to me, if you notice I didn't give false information about resolution (which btw DF got it wrong the first time around when they wrote it as 1280x720, they have corrected it since).
|
Okay, we both have our points and they are backed up in the article. We are squabbling over peanuts.
I will agree that regardless of whether you play this on 360 or PS3, you will more or less get the same experience. Neither one is superior than the other.
One game is one game...Well because I have some World of Warcraft to play. Seriously.
We could take this argument deeper and argue Alienware PC vs. PS3 or Xbox 360, but I don't think neither of us are nerdy enough to go that route and waste our time in the trees when we should be enjoying the forest.
