osamanobama said:
Nsanity said:
osamanobama said:
Nsanity said:
osamanobama said:
vid has been posted before. and its just repeating the sites you mentioned. which the majority of them say it one of the best, some say its the best fps, while about 5 say it is the best.
so your point?
like i said, those sites arent really voices of authority, DF and LoT are. and they say its not the best looking.
so it seems your the one in denial.
also werent you the one trying to say Halo's graphics are better/comparable to KZ. yep that was you.
but just so we are clear, you are claiming a game that is not even rendered in HD (not even 720p, ore something higher). correct?
|
The purpose of DigitalFoundry is to give non biased in depth about the game as much as possible and whats going on under the hood and Lens Of Truth well see for yourself
Lens Of Truth
|
you have posted that pic so many times, what is your point with it.
both lense of truth and DF have proper advanced equipment to analize the technical aspects of games.
neither you or ign, or any other site saying it is the best looking have that equipment.
|
that lense of truth are bunch of amateurs trying to get in on digital foundry spotlight
|
what makes them amatuers?
their findings are not to your liking? what?
they are profesionals with proper equipment to evaluate Crysis as well as other games.
but even if you ignore Lot (and drool over what ign said), DF still said proved its not the best looking game.
so youre not going to answer my question.
Do you think a sub-HD (meaning not in HD) game, is the graphics king?
|
First of all you can't "prove" a game is the best looking game. Thats the dumbest thing I've ever read. Can I prove that Michaelangelo is a better artist than Leonardo Da Vinci?
Secondly the only equipment you need to see graphics are your eyes. I don't care if they have a super computer that analyzes every single frame pixel by pixel. Its what you see when you play.
