Vetteman94 said:
disolitude said:
People, I know some of you feel very strongly about consoles but come on...
PS3 exclusives are not in a class of their own visually. They are a "little" better than your average multiplat like Resident Evil 5.
The latest video cards on the PC like the GTX590 and 6990 run Modern Warfare 2 at 1900x1200 and AA and all that shizzle...at 200 frames per second. Thats over 10X more raw performancy powr in real life application. Probably 30-40 X more in theory...
Like, I've played all PS3 visual powerhouse games (other than killzone 3) and I dare you to play Uncharted 2 for 30 minutes and then go play Battlefield Bad Company 2 on Pc on max everything and 1080p. There is no comparison which looks significantly better...
After you see that difference you should agree that PS3/360 exclusives visual performance gap is smaller than the gap between your toes and not worth arguing over.
|
Who cares what they can do on a PC compared to consoles? The differences have already been known. But the differences between multiplats and exclusives on console are huge in most cases, especially the example you gave with RE5.
The comments from some pf the PC people on this site make me hate that I have a gaming PC again. There is no reason to bring up PCs in every discusiion about graphics of games on consoles.
|
No one is comparing PC to consoles.
All I am saying is that the arguments caused by console game visuals which are like 5-10% visual difference...is like beggers fighting for spare change.
Its just sad since the difference is so miniscule and is getting so much attention on forums when its really irrelevant looking at the grand scheme of things. Its on par with people constantly getting in to arguments over which is faster in a straight like...Mustang or Camaro. It really doesn't matter since they are so close performance and because a Ferrari will rape them both sideways...
