| disolitude said: People, I know some of you feel very strongly about consoles but come on... PS3 exclusives are not in a class of their own visually. They are a "little" better than your average multiplat like Resident Evil 5. The latest video cards on the PC like the GTX590 and 6990 run Modern Warfare 2 at 1900x1200 and AA and all that shizzle...at 200 frames per second. Thats over 10X more raw performancy powr in real life application. Probably 30-40 X more in theory... Like, I've played all PS3 visual powerhouse games (other than killzone 3) and I dare you to play Uncharted 2 for 30 minutes and then go play Battlefield Bad Company 2 on Pc on max everything and 1080p. There is no comparison which looks significantly better... After you see that difference you should agree that PS3/360 exclusives visual performance gap is smaller than the gap between your toes and not worth arguing over. |
Agreed, those exclusives are overhyped, you'd think based on some people that the games are rendering powerhouses when they struggle to maintain a pitiful 30FPS on what was medium settings 4 years ago.
As it is, more gamers prefer higher frame rates over visual fidelity anyways, given that COD is getting all the playtime. I bet if devs left in options for turning off all the effects to boost frame rate, most people would take responsiveness over eyecandy, at least for multiplayer.
