Crysis 2 - PS3 vs 360 performance comparison

[mantlepiecek]

slowmo said:

justinian said:

Nsanity said:

nightsurge said:

What I don't get is why LensOfTruth stated earlier that the PS3 version has a much higher/more noticeable frame rate drop/slowdown during hectic scenes and areas, but didn't use any of those segments for their tests it seems.

Lens of Truth are nothing more than bunch of amateurs out to make a name for themselves.

And if they said x360 version was far superior they would be your God.

Just because someone doesn't say what you want to hear doesn't make them amateurs or useless.

I like them because unlike others that just give an (which can be biased) opinion they show results from tests that really can't lie.

No but the terrible comparison of screenshots they posted makes them pretty amateur, they actually started the entire conversations regarding the 360 supposedly having inferior textures because they were unable to spot a screen grab they took before a texture had finished loading.  I agree that such a issue would be up for debate in a performance comaprison but not in a supposed fidelity comparison.  There are plenty of other shots too that seem to be taken mid frame in there that detract form the visual quality too. 

 

They are amateurs at the end of the day, that's not necessarily a bad thing as they at least offer people something for free.

They did the same thing with homefront but they do it to show the texture loading time.

They aren't that amateur. Just not as professional as Digitalfoundry, but DF only gives their opinions on face-off whereas these guys try to make it a little objective.