By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TurdFergusonMcGee on 22 March 2011
Edit Thread
JMan said:
TurdFergusonMcGee said:

You complicated things too much for my liking with this refundable $150 and $20 per month, etc.

I just want them to be a slight or moderate power/graphics improvement, better online services, and cost no more than $300. 


Ok, explain how it's more complicated to pay $150 for a machine and $20 per month vs paying $300 for a machine and $60 a game?  The whole concept wouldn't be marketed at the level of detail I'm posting. That's just for the bean counters and legal aspects.  The marketing would be:

"Try it risk free for as long as you like!  Cancel your subscription anytime and get a full refund on the hardware!"

Would that not be appealing to you?


To be honest I didn't really read the whole thing the first time, but I read it fully now.

I guess its a cool idea, and a lot cheaper in the long run as long as you would normally buy more than 4 games per year. Still just seems too annoying to me though. It sounds more like you're just renting the console than actually owning it. For something that cheap its kinda weird to have monthly payments. 

I could see it working as say $200 for the console (none of that refundable down payment stuff), and then you own the console no matter what...its yours, no monthly payments. But then instead of having game stores everything is bought online and you have the option to buy each game outright (normally) for the usual $50-$60 or you can buy a game plan for unlimited gaming for $20/month but you don't actually own any of the games, you're just streaming them from the online source.