Are IGN stirring the Crysis 2 feud before Embargo lifts????

[selnor]

Doobie_wop said:

selnor said:

Doobie_wop said:

Who is the reviewer in question? Depending on who it is, I can tell you if their a lying asshole or a trust worthy source. I think I might have an idea of who it may be, but I won't mention him just in case I'm wrong.

Mention the trustworthy ones and I'll tell you. :)

Ryan Clements, Anthony Gallegos, Colin Moriaty, Greg Miller (he likes to stir things up from time to time), Hilary Goldstein and Jack DeVries. If Arthur Gies has anything to do with the review, then just ignore it and move on, his possibly the worst reviewer around and he has an abnormally weird 360 bias that even his own co-workers have acknowledged and looked down upon. His possibly the only reviewer that I actually dislike and distrust.

You should move on then.

Wait for DF test. It was Arthur himself. Then again if DF backs him up, do you change your opinion of him?

Gamereactors review also agrees entirely with Arthur.

EDIT:

I also find it hard to believe if his co workers think that, then why was he given the most important visual game to appear on both platforms this gen to review???????????