Have only played the Crysis 2 Demo as not out here yet. But based on the PC one i think it looks better graphics wise then KZ3. I think he makes a good point about Killzone 3 being more a coridor shooter while Crysis 2 being open world. Because of that more things are going on. In a game like KZ3 the things they choose for you to see on the linear path are outstanding. They look amazing. But in Crysis 2 the graphics are great everywhere. The world is a lot bigger and wherever you decide to head off to every place looks great. So because in Crysis 2 the place is a lot bigger and you have more freedom to go where you want and do what you want those graphics impress me more. If Crytek chose to concentrate only on selected areas and made it linear no doubt it would of looked even better.
I was not a fan of KZ3 overall though. Great graphics don't make a great game. Crysis was an awesome game with some memorable gaming moments, i hope Crysis 2 has just as good story and gameplay as its graphics.
