I like Crysis 2, it's undeniably the best looking game on 360 and up for debate as being the PCs best on hardcore settings but on PS3 I still feel Killzone 3 has a definate edge.
Crysis 2 didn't blow me away visually like Killzone 3 did just a month a go; Killzone 3 looks better then any other console game period and I can't see Uncharted 3 topping it; based on the latest Uncharted 3 videos it's not looking that much better then Uncharted 2 (not that that's a bad thing) which isn't as technically impressive as Killzone 2 let alone 3. I always felt God Of War 3 looked better then Uncharted 2 but perhaps that's just me.
Back on subject, I felt Crysis 2 had a few too many noticable jaggies to be really great after all the PS3 version is yet another port lacking any optimization other then coding. Games optimized for both 360 and PS3 always look best on PS3 (ref: Final Fantasy XIII).
Crysis 2 looks good but not THAT good; when talking about graphics gameplay is irrelevant hence why we don't need to take "into consideration" the size of the area each game is rendering. Graphics are standalone viusals.
Regardless of visuals if Crytek don't fix the server issues and melee issues I won't be buying it any time soon; I'll stick with Killzone 3 as I'm sure all of you are suprised to hear me say, *lol*.
All my personal opinion though, respect it but don't insult me for it.
