What he is saying is both game can at time look better than the other. So in his words graphically Crysis 2=Killzone 3. He prefers Crysis 2 artstyle over Killzone 3. Once again we have PS3 defenders in here disagreeing with someone who has played both games, given his opinion on both games, and come to the conclusion that Crysis 2 is as impressive as Killzone 3.
@CGI
He talks about more stuff being rendered on screen because Crysis 2 is a more open environment compared to KIllzone 3. Killzone 3 is very linear therefore less stuff needs to be rendered. This doesn't mean Crysis 2 has more enemies than Killzone 3 or more "stuff" happening on screen. It means more of the environment needs to be rendered. He is wrong in saying more stuff is rendered on screen because you can only see so much on the screen at a time. What he should have said is CryEngine 3 has to render more stuff in realtime because there are more places to explore.
