Words Of Wisdom said:
Excuse me? Where did I mention sales in my post? Don't put words into my mouth, you're not good at it. |
I'm not saying you're talking about sales, I'm saying that I am. This conversation was started by me, and it is a discussion about sales and the viability of genres in the current (and future) market conditions. You don't get to change a topic you didn't start. You decided to respond to me -- talk about what I'm talking about, please. Understand what I am saying.
The generalization you are making about graphical possibilities on the PS3 is your own. I do not agree with it, and I specifically chose my language to avoid that very generalization. If I DID want to make that generalization, I just would have said "the PS3." But I did not say that, because it is not what I meant. Let me say this again, directly, for your benefit: I am not saying that the PS3 is not capable of Wii-level graphics. I am using the term "PS3 level" to indicate a specific level of graphical and technical complexity that has a certain developmental cost inherently associated with it. Acknowledge this difference please, because I have now explained it to you twice.
The point here is simple, Words of Wisdom: graphics of the quality we expect from PS3 games -- and beyond, in future generations -- cost a lot of money. Lots of tried-and-true genres such as jRPGs by and large do not produce enough revenue to warrant the development of the graphical and technical assets necessary to produce them.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">