By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 17 March 2011
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
selnor said:

I have to disagre on your hammered for visuals comment. As far as the ~PC version. Yes. Because the PC Community wanted Crysis 1 x 2. Not somethingsimilar in Graphics level or slightly worse.

As far as the consoles versions go. For the last year media has been very positive. In fact alot of media point out just how much more realtime stuff the engine is doing than current console games. Most console games use tricks, as well as tight level design. Rather than the vastness media talk about with Crysis 2. The thing you here the most is how CryEngine 3 has no smoke and mirrors. It lends itself to critiscm because it is and honest realtime engine.

You really need to see what's being said of the game, it hasn't been as positive as you think. Sure, maybe the demo is an early build (on PS3), but the demo should represent what you want people to shell out $60 on. Right now, many gamers aren't happy with the demo (and it was similar with the original 360 demo too).

It was obvious to me the demo did not represent the games graphics. It was nothing more than testing the gamers waters to see how the online would work.

Even the poorest quality Crysis 2 singleplayer video will show you this.

More importantly, The media who have played the game are positive so far. And if the rumours are true, other big media reviewers will state some big things.