By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 17 March 2011
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
mendozahotness said:
CGI-Quality said:

Funny, they haven't actually said that since mid 2010

It's the quote on the box. Legally it has to be from a review and from these visuals, you can see why, they're completely unprecedented on consoles.

CGI-Quality said:

and OPM didn't say it at all.

soz, i meant that it looks better than KZ3, they said that.

Its in the review.

Really, link it.

And none of what I've seen from Crysis 2 on console is "unprecedented". In fact, it's been getting hammered for it's visuals through and through (and not just from PS fans). And CVG hasn't reviewed it.

Edit - OPM describes Crysis 2 as “Excellent – technically strong, visually outstanding and full of welcome fresh ideas.”

I'm not seeing any mention of Killzone 3.

I have to disagre on your hammered for visuals comment. As far as the ~PC version. Yes. Because the PC Community wanted Crysis 1 x 2. Not somethingsimilar in Graphics level or slightly worse.

As far as the consoles versions go. For the last year media has been very positive. In fact alot of media point out just how much more realtime stuff the engine is doing than current console games. Most console games use tricks, as well as tight level design. Rather than the vastness media talk about with Crysis 2. The thing you here the most is how CryEngine 3 has no smoke and mirrors. It lends itself to critiscm because it is and honest realtime engine.