I mean, honsetly, I don't even get what you think your argueing at this point.... I mean lets review.
1) You came up with some experts who were later shown to not be experts.
2) You brought up 3 analogies, two of which never happened. (Flat Earth and Oxygen) and a third that went against your point. (Galieo)
3) Brought up men of statuotry rape who had to pay child support. The rulings showed the same would apply to women who were statutory raped and don't have the child... point still not made.
4) Brought up a case where a man was a POW and was thrown in jail for not paying child support... and offered zero support that this was because he was man and that it wouldn't happen to a woman. It's just sexism versus men because... you never actually gave a reason here.
5) The prevelence of people not believing rape victims. Which is true, and is true because people look at women as inferior to men, therefore it's impossible to be raped by a woman. That and the idea that "Men want to have sex really badly, and therfore if they cheat it's natural."
I mean, i'm not "dancing around" any points... I'm literally waiting for you to make one.
Also for you to somehow tie this into Julian Assange.
For someone hellbent to start an arguement not even tangentially related to the topic... i'd expect you to have a better one.
