Wikileaks founder a rapist and molester...?

[dib8rman]

Kasz216 said:

dib8rman said:

Kasz216 said:

As for the Physical differences between men and women... my response would be.... not really.

A woman can have children and... that's about it.

Men can't do anything women can't outside of peeing standing up and having good aim.

 

Therefore, the three things that would be different in an ideal world would be

1) Urinals

2) Aborition laws favoring women.

3) Custody laws favoring women when things are fairly equal at a young age because they went through more trouble to "birth" the children.

I guess we consider birth on polarized ends of the importance line.

As it stands there are abortion laws favoring unborn children versus a born woman.

Aye, excuse me but usually it's who is found to be stable for the child with whome the child ends up with. If that is usually the male then that is a personalized issue.

Again your language is what gives away your bias, it's always about giving women rights and that was my main point from before. That arguing for equal rights is not the same as arguing for womens rights.

As for church, the church is the church, maybe a bad example but if Microsofts gaming section goes to shit the office suites will keep that section afloat and I believe used to actually perform that task.  Friends or not the man was persecuted for his statements challenging the popular belief of the church and from what I understand unless my sources are wrong the secular intelligence at the time shared the geocentric belief.

As for the flat earth refference, I was wrong on that one, but you've been keeping on it for some reason that I can't figure out when atleast I think it was clear it was just an example of a paradigm shift. I ended up just pulling a different more accurate example.

I mean I could pull any example really and not the flat earth one to get to the same point.

That over 40% of Americans to this day don't believe that evolution actually happens.

That inorder to believe in the Bible as a theist you'd have to believe that the Earth is roughly 5000 years old and perhaps even that god put the fossils in the ground to test us.

That's just Christians, if you follow communism or other theocracies even socialism you'd have to believe that mandatory altruism leads to egalitarianism and that centralizing of power is accurate and in no way a sign of totalitarianism. Which is the exact line Plato took which has been tested time and time again by activists and philosophers who had gotten his ideal sorely to failure.

For the most part the past arguements were litterally reworked copy paste off of the spear head anti-misandry website reworked for the post as well as most of the refferences.

The entire point was to indicate there are other voices and that taking a charge to cripple men politcally and legally is the consequence of pushing laws that protect the select few and in this case that few is 51% of the worlds population.

I've made my position clear for that one. Oddly enough I wouldn't use the Spear Head for any type of refference as the sites blogger and commentors are flagrant racists but again it's just to get the point across.

As for the issue with the flat earth again my mistake, but again it wasn't the point and it would have held merit if I said 900AD and then the arguement would deal with Helenic teachings and Muslims and so on which would have brought the crux of my point out anyway.

In Layman's... be careful what you wish for...

And again, 40% of American's not believing evolution exists... is consistant, with YOUR point and line of thinking.

Every example you've given has gone against your arguement.  Not for it.

Cases in which men face a negative bias are a direct result of the biases towards women.  By getting rid of the negative biases against women, you get rid of the negative biases towards men.

While if you get rid of negative biases towards men... that's all you get rid of.

So yeah, it actually is argueing the same thing.

Problems men face when it comes to equal rights is specifically created because of inequality towards women.

They are symptoms to women not being considered on the same level as men.

Oh wow, so your trying to spin the point... that is really lowbrow. Sorry but I have to hit myself for not seeing the big picture of your argument, this whole time I thought you were making a point now I see your dancing around one.

If you want to take the side of ultra-feminism and go for laws that are totally lopsided in representation under the guise of equality and why? Because your the victim then you can take the bloody violin elsewhere.

I'm only  upset I didn't notice that's what you were doing sooner; I’ve never practiced this type of argument before.

I guess in the end this will be an argument for the next generation or maybe my own if I live that long, for now I'll stick with debating Islamic apologists who hold your “we are the victim” argument.

It's really the same argument in principle; I'm supposed to blame myself, my way of life and not the Islamic threat to it, and you would want me now to blame myself, my gender role and not the feminist threat to it. It's going to have to be a case of debilitating laws being enacted that force a revision on this topic.

If I'm wrong then a lot of wind, ink and buttons would have been spared the pain of explaining away sadomasochistic pop-fare.