By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zarx said:
AussieGecko said:
blackops312 said:

On the IGN review it is supposed to have horrible graphics and a very short campain but the multiplayer sounds good.


they didnt say it was horrible, they gave it a 6.5/10 from memory


didn't you get the memo in game reviews anything below a 7 is terrible...

Ah they actually said the game was pretty decent, but not worth the money if you're a fan of single player as the length is really short. This is kinda odd consider the effort they made in making and promoting the story. The multiplayer is a cod-clone with some added vehicle for spice, this is fun for a lot of people but I'm not a huge fan of the COD style gameplay... I much prefer the more tactical gameplay from battlefield.

In short while the game got a 7 IGN had almost nothing but praise for it. They only had 2 complaint.

> Single player was too short (but what was there was good!)

> Game's graphic is subpar when compare to their competition