Kasz216 said:
So in otherwords... if someone who is raped is then thrown in jail because she "didn't seem credible" and then was later exonerated, that would be one too many and we should get rid of penalties for anyone that makes a false accusation roght? Er, Galieo had nothing to do with the earth being flat though. It was an arguement between Heliocetnraism, (The earth is round, everything rotates it.), Tychonian Geocentrism (Some planets rotate around the sun, some around the eart, the sun rotates around the earth) and Geocentrism. The first two were scientific equals at the time and mostly taught in universities while the third was what the Church maintained, but was content ignoring until Galieo started insulting church figures. |
The point of the example must not be as clear as I thought then.
Galileo, and why did he start offending church figures? Nevermind the example was besides the point, I gave a much less disputable one anyway and again the point isn't the discoveries.
Hey if the ruling sticks with you so be it again it's an ethical difference.
As far as the rulings logic goes, the woman should never have been sent to jail because a 15 year old wanted to have sex with her -- bet she wished she had that judge for the rape trial.
Woops, my error it was Joseph Priestley, sorry about that again my error. John Adams gave him protection in the US from the church of England. (Easy for me to confuse the two.)
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:









