CDiablo said:
1) Show me where I can sell one of my liscenses for a steam game. Dont play semantics with the issue, you know what I mean in reference to steam. I know disk based games have liscenses but you can resell them if needed. You cannot sell a steam game or account(legally). 2) There are a number of games that are still sold outside of steam that do not require you to attach your name to a account of any kind. Pretty sure Dragon Age 1 does this. Witcher2 will do this as well(may be wrong but I think retail copies will) 3)Ok I agree it is not a steam problem, but devs are abusing this ever since steam came about and became popular. Valve is one of the first teams to popularise this kind of liscense and I do blame steam to a small extent. GFWL games are not restricted in this way. 4)Never stated this in any way, shape or form in my OP. Not sure how anyone who read it could make that connection. x) No I should worry about being able to play 2 online games at the same time cause I paid (theoritically for a new game) $50-$60 for the fucking game. I own 2 360's, 2 PS3s and 2 of every other system for the most part and can have 2 different games online at once, and deserve the same from my multiple pcs. Its in no way restrictive as persitsant internet connection but its a problem. I find the acceptance of the whole business model strange because I think if there was a movie service ala netflix where you bought movies at full price ($20) to tie it to an account it would fail in a heartbeat. MP3 services work because $.99 is throwaway money in the short run, but I never thought this business model would work for full retail games. |
1. You brought it up so don't get pissy when you're wrong. I'd love to see a store that takes used recent PC games.
2. Right, but again, not a Steam problem. That's completely dependant on the game and not on Steam at all. Valve simply chose to make TF2 tied to your account, it has nothing to do with Steam. If you don't like that, that's cool but it has nothing at all to do with DRM's and this thread.
3. Wait, what is your point 2 about?
4. Then what did you mean by typing this: Last problem is I cant have 2 games running online at once. Again if anyone with friends or family has 2 computers and one wants to play Team Fortress and the other wants to play Dawn of war they are SOL unless they buy another copy registered to another steam account.?
x) Again, it's not a big deal really. I agree it is a drawback but it isn't anything major. It's not something that is going to affect many people and it's simply a security measure. Again, it's cool you don't like that but calling it extremely restrictive because of just that is wrong. It's restrictive but it's not that bad. You can always play games offline and if it's that big of a deal, then either get two accounts or get over it.
People accept it because it's not a big deal. Most people don't have two of every system. In fact, a very small percent own every system (Wii, PS3, 360, PC) and an even smaller percent own two of every system. Hell, a large percent doesn't even own two systems. Most families do not own multiple gaming computers.








