By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:

dsis

What was so important about gauging the town's thoughts on those questions?

It really looked like you were looking for support in voting Heph.

Since I haven't played with everyone here, or the rest of you guys for awhile I decided to throw it in for a refresher, as well as to liven up the conversation 

And as I said in a previous post the first question is important because it would show me if I could avoid the same old tired arguement of whether or not we need a day 1 lynch.

And what do you mean I was looking for support in voting Heph? You mean to give a reason? Yeah, people seem to not like it when I vote randomly on this site, or do you mean I was looking for other people to vote him too? If so, that makes no sense as I didn't know he lies nor did I ask those questions just to give me a reason to vote him. I had no intention of voting for him till after he admitted he is fine with lying to the town 

You also said that 20% rule was more popular on this forum. It really isn't. We almost always go for 1-3 ratio. 25%
"20% Or one in five "- that is a ridiculous setup. One free night and day for every mafia playing. With 5 mafia, that would be 4 days of free mislynching when every day those lynches and night kills bring the town closer and closer to finding a mafia. Also, with so many townies, that would really secure a cop getting many investigations.

Strange, but ok O.o 

The last few times that I remember playing here I could sware I remember 20%, but as Trucks can tell you I have a horrible memory

I don't make the rules. I just play the game... And the 20% is the one I have played with the most, be it here, or mafiascum(<-Especially mafiascum)

You also fail to factor in third parties. A serial killer would make the game much shorter 

I also think that going after someone because they admit to "lying" is very meta, as is your discussion of the game structure. That leads me to believe that you are trying to create discussion where none really exists; Rationalizing your vote (despite your carefree attitude about voting), and typically coming off as "safe" and "supported".

And discussion is a bad thing? I don't see how lying can be a good thing at all. It just gets in the way. Yes,  you might get lucky and no one might notice it, but if someone does you create a lot of confusion and wasted effort that can be used to hunt scum. 

I've played here before, and I know what happens if I vote for someone with no reason. It doesn't end well. So yes, I did give some reason for my vote. If someone else comes up that needs pressure or someone that I genuinly believe is scum appears then I will change my vote to them.

Also discussion is the single most important part to scum hunting. For some reason not all scum are like Mario and tell you in their first post of the game(-_-).


I don't think a mafia should be coming off with so much attention, but I'd be willing to vote you rather than Heph.

What's stopping you? Throw that vote down on me



Sig thanks to Saber! :D