Nsanity said:
snfr said:
Really, this thread shows very well why I don't give my opinion about graphics anymore (usually).How could this thread end up in a debate if Halo:Reach or Killzone 3 is looking better?
Anyway, some people here have to stop commenting on games they haven't played. I see Nsanity trying to prove that Halo:Reach looks better than Killzone 3, although I'm quite sure he never even touched Killzone 3 or any of the big graphical PS3 exclusives. Really man, there are more than enough reviewers who agree that Killzone 3 is the best looking game on the market. Just believing reviewers when they have the same opinion as you is pretty pointless. They are both great looking games, but I find the claim that Reach looks better than KZ3 quite ridiculous (and yes, I own and played both). Really man, that's nothing against you personally, you're a good poster most of the time, but you need to be way more objective...
Then I also see some people who act like the best looking PS3 games can't be beaten. But they can be beaten, they just haven't been yet. And I guess many of you also haven't played games like Halo:Reach... Really, I give you guys the same advice which I give to Nsanity: try to be more objective and just don't comment on games that you haven't played or don't even own the console to play it on.
Just for all you guys again: Please don't take this as an offense!
But well, there are a few posters in here who really made very good comments (like CGI and trasharmdsister).
And finally my take on the topic:
Everything I've seen so far of Crysis 2 looks great and I will judge for myself if it is the best looking game on consoles or not. I'll probably just rent it though because my interest in Crysis 2 isn't really big.
|
I never said Halo Reach was better than killzone however i did point out that some of the things in Killzone are far from perfect and already been done in other games so cut the crap guys and stop tryn to spin this on one person.
|
I'm not trying to spin this just on you, as I said, there are several people in here who behave ridiculous.
And sorry, but your whole way of arguing in this thread clearly points in the direction that you think that Reach is graphically superior to Killzone 3. Furthermore, every game has parts in it which are not perfect, but that's something that I don't have to tell you. My main complaint is still valid: you shouldn't judge games you haven't played.
And I btw. don't even think that Killzone 3 is the best looking game on the market...
