Khuutra said:
Support, maintenance, and energy transferance are going to be a lot easier when the reactor is closer to where people live - at least, I imagine that's the case. |
Yup that's my guess too, in the end money is more important. Hydro-electric dams can be build in remote areas, just as geothermal power plants. But it's cheaper to be closer to exisiting infrastructure when you have a choice. Although if it was in a remote area it might have been a lot more difficult to send in emergency cooling equipment. (yet those should be on site if money was not a factor)
I found this an interesting read of the subject, it takes a long time to 'turn off' a reactor. http://theenergycollective.com/nathantemple/53384/how-shutdown-and-core-cooling-japanese-reactors-likely-functions







