| oniyide said: 1st he played more of the game than probably anyone here combined so that automatically makes his opinion more valid than anyone on this post IMHO. 2nd he played through the main campaign, since when did one have to play every single thing to give a fair review??? Playing through the campaign should be enough. why should he force himself beyond that to play something he really doesnt like?? Ima going to pass on this game, not cause of this review but because the file download is too big. anything higher than 5 gigs is stupid to me. theres a bluray freaking use it Sega. The game has to be spectaclar for me to get that. im running outta space and after playing #3 ill wait for a price drop or i clear my harddrive. not that 3 was bad it was good not great |
Because it's his job. Does anyone like every part of their job? As a reviewer he is supposed to play every part of the game, even if he doesn't like it. For example I'm a teacher and I think many of the things I'm supposed to teach are crap, but guess what, it's not up to me to decide what to teach. I get paid to do my job. The reviewer gets paid to write a prefessional review.
