sapphi_snake on 11 March 2011
rocketpig said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
rocketpig said:
Because unless the police, our judges, and our lawyers can follow the proper procedure to convict a criminal and assure their guilt, the entire system is pointless. We may as well just start taking people out back and shooting them in the head without a trial.
|
And because of that you want this dangerous criminal to walk the streets? Hope he moves next door to you in that case.
|
You're distorting his point. He's saying he wants a fair justice system which you're incorrectly interpreting as he wants dangerous criminals walking the streets.
I must say I'm glad all the politicals I usually debate against agree with me on this one, wouldn't expect less of libertarians =P.
|
Yes, and in obtaining this "fair justice system", he wants dangerous criminals to get off, because the authorities made mistakes (which in no way changes the fact that those dangerous criminals, like this one, are guilty).
|
Good God. Arguing with you is like sticking your dick into a wood chipper. It may seem exhilerating at first but it quickly turns bloody and painful.
|
This analogy would be even more awsome/funny if you actually based it on personal experience. 
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
