scottie on 10 March 2011
I don't get this thread. It sounds to me like a cut case of
A game (Dragon Age) was made and it was good
Then a sequal was made and it sucked balls compared to the first one.
In their infinite wisdom, the professional reviewers gave it high marks because that is what is expected for the sequal to a high budget game.
In their stupidity, the users reviewed it based on its merits as a game.
Move the hell on, if you make a bad game, be prepared for people to shit on it.
