Kasz216 said:
Why wouldn't they agree? The Youtube supona that was granted basically gives that away. As for distribution... that's not even what sony claimed they wanted it for. They wanted it for jurisdiction reasons. |
No, the first reason is to prove the ditribution:
"One is to prove the “defendant’s distribution” of the hack. The other involves a jurisdictional argument over whether Sony must sue Hotz in his home state of New Jersey rather than in San Francisco, which Sony would prefer."
About subpoena of the IP owner, I really dont think theres enough evidence of illegal act against them for a judge to agree. Its not easy to get a search warrant or subpoena, you need solid evidence agaisnt someone.