| Slimebeast said: In KZ3 the penalty is only apparent when 3-D is on (you get no motion blur and you get sub-HD res). In 2-D mode everyone can see the improved graphics. Everybody wins. But other games handle 3-D differently - some devs make the whole game, including the 2-d version of the game, look worse and thus suffer from 3-D support. Not saying I know which method UC3 is using. |
naw man they took the motion blur out in 2d mode too and prerendered the cutscenes because they had to make gfx cutbacks from the first game which did all the cutscenes in rt and had awesome blur
| CGI-Quality said:
Something tells me that later on down the road, new UC3 screenshots/footage/gameplay will feed you full of crow. I still remember the early days of Uncharted 2, where people claimed it looked no different to Drake's Fortune. Look how that turned out. |
maybe you don't remeber right
http://www.psu.com/Uncharted-vs-Uncharted-2-visual-comparison--a005801-p0.php
"it's almost surprising to see that Naughty Dog is able to improve upon the graphics and turn out something even more spectacular than its predecessor.
http://www.glinkster.com/First_Uncharted_2_Screens_Are_Gorgeous_8302
i found a thread about it on a website called neogaf on da first pics
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=345546
it was all good stuff dear
