badgenome said:
And the fortitude to take away people's guns so that they will never, ever, ever have any recourse if they're sick to the teeth of the government stealing their money and lavishing it on favored constituencies? That would be swell. Oh, and maybe some nice, broad speech codes so that net contributors to society will be afraid to even speak out! Yay, socialism! |
Ultimately a balance could be struck with the right emphasis on both civil rights and economic entitlements (the former having sadly never been an element of any applied Communist doctrines either in the Leninist or Maoist vein), as a society without free-range guns would ultimately have no need to worry about dissidents (all you'd have to worry about is the army defecting, but the army defects at the end of a bankrupt regime at any level of oppression), and so could allow the forward-thinking, backwards-thinking, and sideways-thinking elements of speech to survive without worry.
What's going on in Nepal now is a good example. Control of the Marxist-Leninist party in a multiparty system that was, according to international observers, freely and fairly elected. Free speech is essential for social growth, but the role of the state is non-debatable.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







