Pk9394 said:
Icyedge said:
Pk9394 said:
Ail said:
Icyedge said:
"One is to prove the “defendant’s distribution” of the hack. The other involves a jurisdictional argument over whether Sony must sue Hotz in his home state of New Jersey rather than in San Francisco, which Sony would prefer. Sony said the server logs would demonstrate that many of those who downloaded Hotz’s hack reside in Northern California — thus making San Francisco a proper venue for the case."
|
Thank god for posting this. I mean you would think the 99 other posters in this thread would have looked for it instead of speculating on what Sony will do with the IPs...
The gem posts in this thread makes you wonder how the human race ever got out of caves and learned to make fires............
|
And thank god you pointing out how corrupted and unfair our Justice system is siding with the evil Large corporate(Aka Sony).
|
If the information are really that sensitive (which they arent because the ISP will not give your personal informations), you can always blame the judge for not mandating someone else to look at it. But you need to realise it was a necessity to solidly prove the distribution and its scale. Subpoena are made for that, whether your a corporation or an individual.
|
I'm done talking here, I talk about one thing and then Sony ass kisser talk about other. No point of debating here, if you like the way corporate corrupting our government so more power to you. I would love the supreme court to step in and investigate why the judge is granting Sony the right to invade privacy and picking their playing field (California) judges that are notoriously known for siding with the Mega Corporates.
|
How was my reply not related? (between, sony ass kisser, lame)
Now for the rest of your post. I dont like corruption at all. But I do like that theres enforcement over illegal action done on the internet. I would approve a case like this whether its a corporation (any corporation) or individual as long as they arent sueing the downloader/viewer.
