Rath said:
You're comparing an article in a scientific journal to bigfoot. Why would we have known about this ages ago if true? It's fossilised bacteria on a meteorite, not some anal probing alien.
I'm genuinely hoping your post was just trolling. |
While what he said likely wasn't informed.
From the sound of it, the reputation of the journal in which the study was pubished is actually somewhat lower then bigfoot.








