| dib8rman said: Okay, I have a little time so I will elaborate, my question with the ICC being able to judge a someone while ignoring jurisdiction comes from allegations being placed against certain US persons for war crimes yet the ICC can't do anything about it. Mr. Stick Ball I wish I had some pictures of the north Ireland revolt, if they do start using the weapons in those pictures their country could slip into turmoil. |
Well the USA can veto any referal from the security council and are not a state party so it's impossible for the ICC to investigate. In any case I don't think most the acusations levelled against G.Bush and co. are war crimes as such, they're about fighting an illegal war. The ICC is quite limited in its jurisdiction, it cannot investigate whether a war is illegal - only if actions during a war are war crimes.
