| Mr Khan said: I'm interpreting Sony's every act as anti-consumer to the extreme hilt here. They've acted in bad faith in the past and continue to do so, and i'm just mad that they're being allowed to get away with it, hence my wish for them to get their ass handed to them with extreme prejudice. I understand where your argument is coming from, it's interpreting their stance more neutrally than mine, but it seems to me that if all Sony were doing were trying to establish jurisdiction (which they shouldn't be worrying about if they were actually confident in their own case), they wouldn't need to put themselves in this damaging position of looking like the bad guy by poking into other companies' information, all to do something that they really probably don't have a right to do in the first place I'm not ignorant of the meaning of your explanation, just stupidly angry on my part:P |
This is the secondary reason. The first and foremost reason is to prove the distribution and the scale of this said distribution. The prejudice cause to Sony from Geohot action depends completely of this information.
