Resident_Hazard said:
The only weapon that seemed at all any different was the sickle. Everything had the exact same effect on enemies. The only real difference was in execution animations. But, since you want "specified dislike," I here's the (negative only) part of my review: [snip]I'm sure you'll have another post simply dismissing this as well, with no details other than "you're objectively wrong and stuff, and I love Ninja Gaiden so much, I don't understand how anyone can view such a half-assed game differently." Keep in mind, I did have nice things to say about the game, just not very many. |
If y ou think that the only different weapon was the sickle, you're wrong; again, no two weapons have the same reach, speed, combo ability, or damage. You can keep repeating that all you like (though I guess it's sort of encouraging that you backed off on this point, sort of) but you're still going to be wrong. All it does is betray the fact that you never bothered to familiarize yourself withh the weapons.
I'm not going to bother replying to the entire excerpt of your review; I am not in the habit of acknowledge arguments that weren't tailor-made for me, but I'll do it a little here.
Nothing in Ninja Gaiden Black or Ninja Gaiden II is luck-based. If you die, it's your fault. There are people who can get through the game on any difficuty without dying. I can't do it, but those people do exist.
If you fight enemies using only X and bosses primarily using Y, you are bad at the game.
I don't care what you thought about the game. I am replying only where you are incorrect - and yes, that includes correcting you in cases where your dissatisfaction comes at least partially down to your inability to adapt to the game's system.
