| superchunk said: At this point, I think they shoudl form a full revolution and not this protesting as it won't obviously work with Qaddafi. The other nations were primarily peaceful with a relatively small set of violence. Their leaders had enough sense not to make a war with their people. Qaddafi seems hell bent on remaining a dictator to his own death in necessary. Well, that means the only resolution, if the people really want full reform, is to pick up arms and fight.
US and others shoudl largely remain neutral. The Arab league has said they might take front stage if needed to stop mass killings / enforce no fly zone and that is preferred as its their region and kin. But, they all have their own turmoils right now and maybe NATO will have to at least enforce a no fly zone to keep it from turning into a genocide. |
The Arab League has no business in Libya either, or at least they have as much business as NATO. The League first and foremost must observe their members nations sovereignty.
It would be no different than if the US got involved. At this point if the AL did get involved the US would be forced to as well just for the politics of the matter.
I'm afraid Khadafy so far is within every right to uphold the law of his land and the global community can just sit and watch.
If your reasoning is that simply because of geography and the consequences within that the AL are qualified to be involved in Libya without Khadafy breaking international accord then the US and UN have every right to enter Iran at any point in time or Saudi Arabia; simply because we are on the same planet.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
