| PullusPardus said: i didn't say it looks better, i've said the difference isn't huge to call this "Next Gen" and for this to "DESTROY everything on PCs/Consoles" edit : AussieGecko said: Yeap and Heavy Rain is a weird example. Is that considered a game or a walking CGI? I really don't know. Godamn, for a moment i thought i would take you seriously =/ ,now i can't. |
The only reason why I said that is that some people believe U2 to have the better graphics, from what I have seen I just can't agree. Or is it the spelling. Wierd. Is that better?
The bits that I am interested in is the little detail, the ones that arent on these games today because the games cant run it. That is what interests me and that is what Heavy Rain doesnt have, nor does any other game this gen.
Why is this such a big deal? All to do with polygons, those little things take shit loads of polygons that the computer would have to render. It would be a son of a bitch to do when also doing levels etc if they also have the same detail.
