Islam is not bad, too many of you are ignorant of history.

[dib8rman]

superchunk said:

dib8rman said:

 

So essentially what you just said is that no one should judge Islam by it's observable merits but instead should see it the way you see it.

The disturbing but expected thing is that your words sound like any other fanatic I've ever heard utter them before you and most of them much more eloquently.

I think they should judge Islam by its source, the Qur'an. By doing so they should not distort it and should consider what it says in context to the entire book as well as history when it was written. My point is that modern Islamic nations by large are following their own Hadith literature and not what the actual Qur'an says. This is not fanatic and its certianly not representative of Islam as it originated.

I don't see how anything I have said could in any way be perceived as a 'fanatic'. Just because I disagree with your viewpiont doesn't mean I'm automatically wrong.

I wonder if you actually read my post you quoted or simply dismissed it all together.

Okay Mr. Rubber I'll be your glue if you'd accept that your arguing against the modernisms of Islam.

I'll be forth right and say if you do accept this (which as far as I am concerned you already have) your at the very least showing how intentionally fundamental your position is, all allusions from there I'll leave to anyone who chooses to read this thread to judge. (My apologies)

And honestly dialectic with you seems totally pointless and not because of any virtue of truth in your words; a concept your clearly divorced of but rather your explicit relativism.