FaRmLaNd said:
Zlejedi said:
FaRmLaNd said:
Zlejedi said:
Yeah sure and according to swedish law in case of such crime whole process will be done behind closed doors.
That's smells conspiracy from few hundred kilometers.
|
Define such cases. If you mean rape cases then if thats the law for such cases then how is this any different if its part of a consistently used court process, if all such cases are done behind closed doors then why is this one different? How do you distinguish between the conspiracies and the proper trials if thats the case? Or do you mean cases involving people that are extradited?
Not a fan of closed court cases regardless, it just fuels unwarranted speculation. Got a source that it'll happen behind closed doors?
|
http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?ID=209688&R=R1
That's a very convient custom in this case isn't it?
|
So, if its common in Sweden then how are you using this as justification that its a conspiracy. If its something they often do, then thats consistent. Sure its convenient, but to make the next leap to "That's smells conspiracy from few hundred kilometers." seems a bit much in my opinion, since they aren't making an exception for Assange, they're just doing what they normally do.
|
Also
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12427839
God forbid someone try and protect the rape victim though.
It's also funny how all this stuff is generally comon place and ignored until someone famous wants to try and twist it to get themselves out of trouble.
