Zkuq said:
I was just about to put this in a way that would certainly get me banned: you are so wrong about this. You've really bought all that corporate propaganda they've been feeding you. Guns aren't illegal because they can be used for crimes, and the same should go for software. If you use it for illegal purposes then that's a problem but until then, there's no problem: innocent until proven otherwise. It sucks, but no one seems to care about things like consumer rights of freedom of speech these days (and I'm not trying to say they're the same thing or necessarily even connected - I'm just saying that's two things no one seems to care about anymore).
Two wrongs doesn't necessarily make a right. In fact, innocent until proven otherwise and yet here Sony is treating everyone like a criminal. Also, I'm perfectly fine with Sony banning custom firmware users from using PSN. |
Always the gun argument... so do try this with a weapon, buy it, modify and sell the same weapon 1000 times... or it will be impossible or another crime that is selling the same product more than once, and this is why is argument is so lame (altough it's illegal to make one gun into something you don't have a right to keep, as your gun registration is for the one you bought not the one it became after modify)...
I doubt Sony would be pissed if anyone maked a PSN.Hack just for them to play and it didn't offer pirated games, just a conection to homebrewers and cheaters to get along... i see people hacking PSN not making one for them...

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







