Gnizmo said:
"On my second point, you took it the wrong way. What I meant was the equality in attracting a gamer, that is the worth in a console's library. Is red dead redemption an exclusive because its not on the PC? No I think you took my point the wrong way. The question was not rhetorical. Exclusivity is meaningless when playing a game. FFVI has been on countless systems, but I still love replaying it as much as when it was exclusive to the SNES. A game existing multiple places does nothing to diminish its value, and as such contributes to the value of the system it is on. My 360 is fun to play even though I own maybe 2 exclusives. I still like owning the system, and it was still the best choice for me at the time I bought it. |
The first point can be avoided by sacrificing RAM and video card early on to reduce the costs, and get a comparitively good CPU. Later on as you need you can go on upgrading your video card and RAM without changing anything else.
But you are right of course, some people will have problems. Which is why I did point out that console exclusives are important as well.
The third point I didn't mean the value of a game. I meant the value that it gives exclusively to a system.







