PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerilla

[Squilliam]

osamanobama said:

Squilliam said:

osamanobama said:

yeah, but bluray player for that cheap a shit.

ps3 is still one of the most affordable bluray player around, and its also the 2nd best bluray player there is, the best one is more than twice the cost.

For $129 you get a Blu Ray player with a remote or universal remote.

For $299 you get a Blu Ray player where you have to use a controller.

Functionally that is more important when they both play the discs identically.

they dont play the disks identically though. ps3 plays them back superiorly, just check cnet, up until a few months ago the ps3 was what the tested all of their HD tv's and blurays on because it was the best (now its 2nd best). also a controller is hardly inconvienent, and i doubt people would care (i know i dont) and if they wanted to they could buy a $20 dollar remote from amazon, which i know adds cost but not much, and they still dont need to (i have because it serves no purpose to get one, and ive owned a ps3 since 2006, with a major intent to use it for bluray playback)

It either plays back Blu Ray or it doesn't. Being marginally better in ways which don't really matter doesn't actually matter, get it? Blu Ray exceeds the requirements of most people and often the capabilities of their TV sets to display it properly.

Finally you can't expect people to spend 20 years using remotes and then instantly want to forget about that and use the PS3 controller, mass market people anyway.