By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:


A) Has been established he can't be sued for damages.

B) There were a lot of problems with the PSN before this?   The credit card hacks existed well before he did anything.

C) There are STILL a lot less problems with PSN then there are 360 and PC in which you almost never run into a hacker anyway.  So you are essentially argueing that he "ruined PSN" by making it less "safe" from hacking, yet still MORE safe then 360, Wii, PC and basically every other system because this requires you to download a special firmware, that sony coudd detect, and then IP ban you... within a day if they wanted because they are sending every piece of information they can to corporate headquarters.

D) Ok, now i'm sure you don't have the frame of refrence for this arguement and just want to be right, because you want to be right.


A) where has it been established?

B) i can only think of 1 time (other than other peoples follies) and that was in 2008.

C) So the psn not encrypting credit cards is still safer than 360 and pc so why are we discusing this? also can you not ip spoof so they wont ban you?

D) can you please stop saying that i am just tired of hearing the same drivel about he is some personification of freedom and has not done anything wrong.

 



EVERY GAMERS WORST NIGHTMARE...THE TANGLING CABLES MONSTER!

            

       Coffee is for closers!