"Wouldn't that have been solved by... Sony not selling the PS3 for a loss. You are basically saying, Sony should be protected for making poor buisness decisions, and because tangentially something he did was used in a wrong way."
You're not in a position to claim their business strategy is just wrong. Selling consoles for a loss at launch to recoup with software has always been a successful strategy for them (and not only for Sony). And it's besides the point anyway.
And I'm not saying Sony should be protected, I'm saying Sony is right to protect themselves and all the software studios etc that depend on them.
"That's like saying gunmakers should be forced to store owners money because the guns they make may of been used to rob stores that don't have robbery insurance."
I fail to see how this analogy has anything to do with the discussion.
