By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chocoloco on 23 February 2011
Edit Thread
AdventWolf said:
chocoloco said:
pariz said:
chocoloco said:

Lets just say it meet my expectations, in other words it sucked. Sorry to any who like the game, but it had the same faults I hated about the first game.

1st- it is a boring button mashing paradise, I even stopped fighing at one point and my crew beat the enemies on their own.

2nd- Thegraphics are still abysmal for a game on the HD bad boys. This would not matter to me though if the gameplay was actually fun.


PC version didn't have that issue. And you can always put difficulty a bit higher.

 I know this and would probably enjoy the pc versions battle stlye better. When I buy my next PC I'll have to upgrade , but than I will hardly have use for my 360.

I agree it is a bit more button mashing in the demo because you don't have all of your skills and traps yet to use, so you are more dependent on basic attacks. Just wait for the actual game to come out to open up all of the good skills and spells to use.

I have to say that the graphics have definitely improved for the PS3 version.

So you think if I actually stuck with EVEN the lst Dragon age for mor than six hours it gets better on the HD consoles as the game progresses? I ask this because I love the story of bioware games, but if the gameplay is not there than it is hardly a game. So basically how long did it take before the battle system got complex enough to involve strategy and not just button mashing?