fordy said:
*sigh* The security code cannot be copyrighted. It is raw binary data. an integer if you will. People cannot copyright integers. However, you do bring up a good point about the creation. If he created the CFW himself, then Sony doesn't have a leg to stand on (yes, even if it was encrypted with the key. The key is never *in* the package. It mathematically rearranges the data to a non-readable form to anything but the PS3.) If it's a copy of Sony's OtherOS that they removed, well....that's a tough one. Since Sony was offering it for free, but then took it away, the courts could see that as merely replacing the service. However I'm not 100% on this part so I can't give anything definite. |
You are right, it is just a code, a number string which cannot be copywrited, a smaller part of a whole, this being the firmware. His CFW he can surely be done for. And no offence to him, but he doesn't look like the type of guy that could write a entire operating system for the PS3 from scratch on his own. All Sony needed to do is get a copy of his CFW and look at the code contained within. If I were one of the Sony programmer's, I'd be annoyed this guy is taking my work and giving it out.
The OtherOS service was like an extra to people to use that allowed you to do more with your console, it allowed you to run other programs and such alike that the PS3 didn't have. It wasn't until Geohot started tampering with it to break the security on the console that Sony decided to remove it.
It's like my example I gave somewhere else about a kid with a football. Give a local kid a football so him and his mates can play on a local field, if he starts using that football to break into the local players hut on the field, I'm going to take away that football. Because of that him, his friends can no longer play, weird analogy but the gist is there. I think.
Hmm, pie.







