Spankey said:
fordy said:
There is a ton of assumption in all of this:
You're expecting the government court to uphold a system by a corporation that could have been fabricated at any time between the court case and the incident. Staw clutching at it's finest. we'll find out soon enough.
The code would not have to be passed amongst companies, but if two keys happen to be the same, two companies can accuse the other of copying their key. You really don't get it, do you?
Aso GeoHot did not circumvent ANY code. For gods sake, he used the door put there legitimately by Sony. He circumvented the security, software verification and authentication measures. This is why homebrew can now pass itself off an Sony's and run on cracked PS3's. there is no denying this. Why are you so blindly stubborn?
I have had enough of this stupid, ludicrous analogy. I made an analogy in an "only if" situation and you're trying to argue your way through that. the situation is too vague and you're trying to defend it as much as you can. Unless you actually bring up a decent reason, I refuse to play this little game anymore. I've stated my position. Toodles.
|
|
You've been clutching at straws the moment that you found out that corporate generated security keys do not follow the same rules and legislation as ISBNs and UPCs.
It's easy to say "you don't get it" when you spout nothing but illogical nonsense and defend a position that not even Sony would bother bringing up in court.
For your information, the door is open to anyone, but it wont help you unless you have a signed data file. He played by the rules that Sony themselves programmed into the PS3. He did NOT circumvent security. Circumvention of security involves finding or creating holes that should not be there. This was Sony's port for publishing content.
You honestly don't get digital legislation, do you?
