Kasz216 said:
LivingMetal said:
Kasz216 said:
A) Why do you keep ignoring the "Point out the intent in the rap lyrics." Is it because, you know you can't. I don't see piracy used anywhere there, and the only statements i've seen him say are "I am against piracy".
B) Find me one case where someone was successful convicted for selling a murder weapon when they knew that person was going to murder someone with it... that wasn't convicted because they sold an illegal gun.
C) I did disprove you... you keep trying to dodge the question though.
|
a) I've been very consistent in saying that geohot is the enabler. I never said he stole anything.
And lyrics such as
"Pound me in the ass with no lube, chafing
You’re fucking with the dude who got the keys to your safe and
Those that can’t do bring suits
Cry to your Uncle Sam to settle disputes
Thought you’d tackle this with a little more tact
But then again fudgepackers, I don’t know Jack"
...and...
"Exhibit this in the courtroom
Go on, do it, I dare you"
...Is less professional and more at an attempt at a threat.
Now, I've addressed you. So according to you, I must be correct.
b) Don't try to change the subject.
c) You're a hypocrite.
|
A) You adressed it... by highlighting nothing that shows intent. So no... you didn't.
B) It's not changing the subject, i'm taking your EXACT analogy and asking you to find one case where it's true. If you can't prove your exact analogy... that means your wrong right?
C) Not about this I'm not. Afterall you can't find away to prove intent works like how it says, because you haven't provided an example of B.
|
Hey, it's not my fault that you fail to see reasoning. You never addressed my points, and you never proved anything to me. All you kept doing was disrespect reasoning while changing the subject in an attempt to avoid a loosing argument.
